Lost Password?
Profession County Advance Search


Home
Resources Articles

The Collaborative Law Revolution: An Idea Whose Time Has Come In Nevada: April, 2004 edition of Nevada Lawyer (State Bar of Nevada), by the Hon. Robert W. Lueck, Family Court Division.

Collaboration is Critical
Chicago Tribune: February 9, 2005

No one needed to tell Kathe Aldrich the grim statistics about women and money and divorce. She and her husband, Charles, had been married nearly 30 years when he asked for a divorce. She immediately began worrying about her financial future.

The Rolling Meadows couple has no children, and Kathe Aldrich, 52, has worked full time for 30 years. Nevertheless, she worried that a nasty court fight could drain her finances. So she and her husband turned to a process known as collaborative divorce and were able to officially split in July without sabotaging their portfolios.

The collaborative process, started by Minneapolis family lawyer Stuart Webb in 1990, provides alternative dispute resolution using a team of professionals working jointly for the couple, rather than in adversarial roles...(more)

Tips For Parents Engaged in the Collaborative Law Process
By Gay G. Cox, J.D. and Honey A. Sheff, Ph.D.
You are to be commended for choosing the collaborative law process as the means to solve the problems you and your child(ren)'s other parent are having. It is evident that you want the best possible outcome for your children and see this as a means of achieving it. Based on experience with families who select this method of problem-solving, it is apparent that they tend to have some very important common values...(more).

Other Articles:

 
Members Reading Corner

Resource/Referral Books and Periodicals

Read more...
 
Member Articles

For Members - Articles

Read more...
 
Practice Group Meeting

Practice Group Meetings

The Practice Groups Committee was formed in 2006 and is comprised of the chairs of each practice group (Loop, McHenry, NW,Northshore, Rockford, WSW). The purposes of the Practice Groups Committee are:

  • To facilitate sharing of information and resources between practice groups
  • To keep the board informed of the activities of the various practice groups
  • To make recommendations to the board regarding the formation of new practice groups and operation of existing practice groups
Practice group membership is one of the perks of membership in CLII and an excellent way to meet other collaborative colleagues practicing in your geographic area. The practice groups meet monthly or semi-monthly.
  • LOOP Contact: King Perkins 312-396-4030 or Rhonda de Freitas

Scheduled Meetings: 3rd Wed. of every month Time: Noon - 1:30

Location: TBA

  • W/SW Contact: Anne Mudd 630-399-8739

Scheduled Meetings: 2nd Thur. of every month Time: Noon - 1:30 or 5:00 - 7:30

Location: Lunch - Braxton's in Oak Brook Evening - TBA

  • NW Contact: Candace Pietschmann 547-639-7058

Scheduled Meetings:

Location: Chessie's Bar and Grill in Barrington

  • North Shore Contact: Brigitte Bell 847-733-0933

Scheduled Meetings: Last Wed. of every month Time: Noon - 1:30

Location: Ruby Tuesday's

  • McHenry County Contact: Gunnar Gitlin 815-338-9401

Scheduled Meetings: Last Wed. of every other month Time: Noon

Location: John Evan's Restaurant in Crystal Lake

  • Northern Illinois Practice Group (Rockford) Keith Morse 815-967-5000

Scheduled Meetings: Last Tuesday of the month

Please check with your Practice Group Leader to verify date, time and location.

 
Kathy and Tim - Children Issues

Kathy and Tim – Caring for the Children

Kathy and Tim had been married for nine years. Kathy worked part-time as a teacher’s aide earning about $20,000 per year. Tim worked in the computer industry earning about $120,000 per year. They had twin boys: aged 6. Tim worked long hours in the past and left most of the parenting to Kathy. But as the children grew older, Tim showed more interest in spending time with them.

Kathy and Tim had been separated for a couple of months before Kathy sought a Collaborative Attorney. Tim was very upset with the separation and wanted to reconcile. Kathy said that Tim was often upset when he came over to pick up the children. He would be crying and begging Kathy to take him back - in their presence. This was upsetting for everyone, but mostly for the children. Kathy said they did not want to go on visits with their father, as they were closer to her and were upset seeing him so visibly shaken.

Tim chose to retain a collaboratively trained lawyer as well, and both attorneys discussed Tim’s reluctance to divorce. Kathy would not entertain any possibility of reconciliation. So it was agreed that Tim would likely benefit from a Divorce Coach. It was recommended that Kathy also retain a Coach to help her understand her emotions and to develop some strategies to best cope with the situation.

After Kathy’s first meeting, and with her approval, her coach had a brief conversation with her attorney. By doing this, Kathy’s attorney was able to learn more about the dynamics of their marriage, including how to approach Tim during the four-way meetings. This discussion helped to avoid triggering Tim in subsequent meetings.

At the first meeting, the Participation Agreement was reviewed and signed. It was also decided that retaining a Child Specialist would be helpful in working through the parenting issues. The Specialist was chosen jointly, and payment arrangements for her services were determined. Then a joint letter was sent ot her, asking her to meet with the children to bring their voices to the process. Everyone also wanted her insight as to the children’s developmental needs.

The Child Specialist met with the children several times. She also met with Tim and Kathy individually and together. When meeting together she shared her insights and thoughts about the children. She helped them work out several pressing parenting issues, such as attendance at extra curricular activities, the introduction of new partners (Kathy had started dating,) and how they were going to communicate regarding issues that would arise around the kids from time to time.

Kathy, Tim, the two lawyers and the Child Specialist then met to work out when the children would be in Tim’s care. The Divorce Coach (and perhaps also the passage of time) helped Tim to accept Kathy’s decision to separate. He was far more emotionally stable around the children. And though they were still having a difficult time leaving their mother, things were improving.

The parties reached an agreement for the children to see their father every Sunday afternoon for the first couple of weeks; the whole day for the next couple of weeks; and then finally for a full day and overnight. The Child Specialist would then meet with the children to see how they were finding their time away from their mother. The gradual increase in time would also give Kathy a chance to adjust to having the children away from her.

In a little over a month, there was another five-way meeting (lawyers, clients and the Child Specialist). The Child Specialist shared insights on the custody arrangement, and the parties were able to agree on a time-sharing schedule for the children that met everyone’s needs. A Separation Agreement was drafted and signed by Kathy and Tim.

They both knew that the agreement they signed that day might have to be adjusted as the needs of the children changed and the circumstances of their own lives changed, but they had developed a good plan that worked. The children were adjusting well and Kathy and Tim were starting to develop a new relationship based solely on working together as parents. They were moving in the right direction. It was an excellent resolution for everyone, especially the children, whose voices and needs were respected and met.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Results 19 - 27 of 42
      Home  |  Site Map  |  Disclaimer  |  Contact Us © Copyright 2007 Collaborative Law Institute of Illinois